The polls, politicians and the reformist theme

The correction- politicians in the courtyard left the old and bad habit of take the lead in the preference of the electorate quoting percentages of an alleged measurement of the Embassy, which was not other than the diplomatic representation of the U.S. Government. They stopped just masturbate mentally speaking of a survey commissioned by friendly businessmen who placed them in certain levels of public acceptance, almost always above their opponents. It was a form of haggle and resist the numbers of the polls that were published and whose results were contrary to their interests and their possibilities.

Now they are not more serious, more sincere, nor more honest, but that public opinion is more warned and the common people more awake. Notwithstanding that change moods, fall smack of the past.

No or party candidate wants to deliver prematurely. The current context, for example, is characterized by u000athe varied and above all the animosity between the interesados…

LA MEDIA- studies of the opinion that now abound as purslane not pleased all of the politicians, and it shows a desire to discredit them or by contaminating them.

But it seems that they already found the average, and the median is Gallup. Those who deny Asisa or the economic centre of the Cibao, resigned with a "I hope the Gallup", as if outside Moses waiting for signal to go up to Mount Sinai for the commandments of the law of God.

Even greater confidence in the Gallup is expressed by opposition sectors, and you want to, the PRD, whose leaders proclaim a truth which is not yet in your hands. Not be if they did the last, or if they will do, but already the percentages are discussed in gatherings of coffee, or between the very aware, but with the old default of which each is attributed the advantage. Do not know what they think the directors of Gallup, but u000athat performance must be difficult: please the fable from around the world. What will happen when finally the Gallup published and does not meet the expectations of all these cores, which in addition to varied, are at loggerheads?...

The item REFORMER- Orlando, thanks for reminding me; many people told me about your comment in the past day 3, so many that I feel compelled to send you this note.

'Re right, it seems, Leonel would become "responsible reformism" franchise and diaspora, which seems logical to me, as it is the only in the LDP with affective links with everyone, however, as you sign up, it did not, however, the purple local leadership, continued their man from leaders of reformism, which still taken less, they are still effective electoral actorsforgotten "dome" and affection and attention you Leonel professed, they are mutinous. Obvious, that Danilo is not guilty, but the LDP, u000aYes.

From the Convention of the PRD in March, I've been quiet, listening to anyone who I visit every corner of the country, in my Office and my home, as always, as I went to hear the reformers in Europe and United States, four and two weeks ago, calibrating for it go where their sympathies and seeing if I can ensure their minimum interests.

Yesterday I received 149 major, I almorcé with them in the courtyard of my Office, as I usually do, I heard the information that each brought in their neighborhood or field, in your words, which I appreciate, with stealth.

But to the arrogance and abuse, only stealth guarantee effectiveness, that as you indicate, credited some of me. These reports constitute a survey of the country and the internal life of reformism, better than any study; We must take this information when it's time to act.

It seems that you read many reformers, they are those who have asked me to write you this note, because u000abelieve, your statements are correct: Leonel lost much time, left space for oblivion and allowed many abuses to reformism.

Danilo should herding fast; Hipólito does not rest, nor is shy to give hugs.

Of Danilo, contrary to what you read in that same publication that another friend says, has no rejection of reformism, anyone, anyone I spoke badly of him in all my travels and meetings, it is the Government that recently, Danilo has not what relations with reformism - except Quique - and Leonel, who had them, left is falling bridges that crossed to irrigate this love coloraohe fired gardeners and, contrary to the nature of reformism, designated a King, not rules, why is a mess and is losing its only ally with votes.

Angel Lockward

Share this article

Digg it!

del.icio.us

MySpace

Facebook

Fark

Reddit

Newsvine