They reject SCJ ruling against an appeal

The movement of Dominico-Haitianas women (MUDHA), encounter Dominico-Haitiano (network Jacques Viau) network and the movement for a free Civil registration of discrimination, criticized a judgement of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) which rejects an appeal lodged by Emildo good Oguis against provision no. 17 issued by the Chamber administration of the Central Electoral Board (JCE) instructed the State civilian officers to examine the records of birth to issue copies, because had allegations of irregular issuing that document.

They said that the decision of the Supreme Court is intended to apply the interpretation made by the same agency in 2005, on the 36.10 article of the law of migration, which implies that the records of births of Dominican children of Haitian parents could be cancelled administratively, what they see as a violation of article 110 of the Constitution.

the u000athey offered Pol Mil, representative of the Jacques Viau network; Francisco Leonardo, lawyer of the free civilian movement of discrimination; Sianny Jean and Ana Maria Belique, through a press conference, in the province of Vizcaya, in the capital restaurant. They expressed that it strikes the later decision that the case was engavetado three years and that the JCE lost six cases in the courts of appeal and went wrong stop audience theme before the Inter-American Commission on human rights, that it is plunged into a crisis of legitimacy institutional.

Described as "political solution" the measure and contrary to the law, understanding pursued close the discussion on the policy of denationalization which applies the State, therefore warned that they will resort to international bodies. "With this unfortunate statement opens one rift to the rule of law and is aggravated the problem of legal uncertainty in Republic" u000a"Dominica", said Leonardo.

( )
The decision taken by the Supreme
the Supreme Court ratified its decision pursuant to a ruling which rejected the appeal lodged by Emildo good Oguis against provision no. 17 issued by the Administrative Chamber of the JCE, which instructed the civilian State officers to thoroughly examine the birth certificates to issue copies, because had allegations of issuing that document pairregular.

The decision is a response to organizations of civil society, national and international, before the country before the Inter-American Court of human rights for alleged denationalization of Haitians.

Accordance with the judgment, the case that led to Emildo good Oguis raise a remedy of amparo against the aforementioned circular, turned out to be a broadcast of irregular and fraudulent birth certificate.

Share this article

Digg it!

del.icio.us

MySpace

Facebook

Fark

Reddit

Newsvine